A San Francisco judge has struck a proposed male circumcision ban from a November ballot, ruling that the city cannot regulate medical procedure and citing religious freedom protections
The ruling was applauded by opponents of the proposed ban, who attacked it as anti-Semitic and anti-Muslim.
In May, advocates of a ban gathered enough voter signatures to put the measure on the city’s ballot.
They described the sacred rite for Jews and Muslims as “genital mutilation”.
The measure, which qualified in May for a spot on the ballot, would have made circumcision of a minor boy punishable by up to a year in jail and a $1,000 (£612) fine.
The US federal government already bans female circumcision.
Jewish and Muslim groups said the proposal was an assault on their ancient religious practice and likened the proposal to circumcision bans in the Soviet Union.
Source :BBC NEWS : 28 July 2011
Related articles
- Judge blocks circumcision ban bid (bbc.co.uk)
- Circumcision ban pulled from San Francisco ballot (theprovince.com)
- Proposed circumcision ban ordered off San Francisco ballot – Reuters (news.google.com)
- Circumcision Ban Won’t Be Popping Up on November Ballot (sfist.com)
- Judge Chops SF Anti-Circumcision Bill, Parents Free To Mutilate Kids (queerty.com)
- Judge strikes circumcision ban from SF ballot (msnbc.msn.com)
- Your Circumcision Rights Are Safe [San Francisco] (gawker.com)
- Judge orders circumcision ban off SF ballot (seattletimes.nwsource.com)
